Return to Profile page Friends |  Journals |  Notes |  Photos |  Posts |  Trackers
All Journal Entries Journals
 |  Del.icio.usYahoo BookmarksFacebookGoogle Bookmarks

Salmonella stpaul outbreak -- part 1

Aug 11, 2008 02:59AM - 2 comments

You probably have seen in the news that there was a salmonella stpaul outbreak. You probably know that it started thinking it was tomatoes. However, no contaminated tomatoes were discovered, so the authorities started looking into foods that are associated with tomatoes, such as peppers and cilantro.

The seemingly slow speed of tracing the outbreak, and the reluctance of the FDA to rule out some foods, led to a firestorm of criticism. In this post, Swampy is going to try and explain the basics of how these investigations work.

When a doctor sees a patient that may have a food borne illness, the doctor may (but is not necessarily required to) report the illness to the local public health department, who will test for the usual suspects. When the cause of the illness is discovered, they'll run a genetic test and place the organisms genetic profile on a reporting system. In the case of the salmonella outbreak, it was on a system called PULSENET.

The software then links the profile to other reported profiles across the country. When it notices that the same genetic profile is popping up in multiple states, the system flags a CDC investigator.

Some health departments, but not all, automatically launch an investigation when they see certain events. For instance, Minnesota has a policy that every case of e coli 0157:H7 is followed up. If you are the person who got sick, someone from the health department will ring your doorbell. They will want to know what you ate, and if it is your food, where you bought it. They'll take samples of your food.

Okay, so now the CDC investigators know of an outbreak. At this point, they will interview the cases, and try to mathematically solve for which food was the culprit. Each outbreak works a little differently. In some cases, the mathematical analysis points to a strong correlation. For the outbreak under discussion, people who ate raw tomatoes were 7 times more likely to get salmonella. That was the point where you saw on the news to avoid fresh tomatoes, but nobody could tell you if a particular tomato was safe.

CDC then forwards the results to FDA. It is the FDA that starts the arduous task of trying to figure out where the tomatoes came from. Tracing food takes a long time as most of the records are paper.

Where do fresh tomatoes come from? Well, at the time of the outbreak, all the tomatoes came from one of two places -- South Florida and Mexico.

Vegetables that are shipped into the US are inspected by USDA. The goal of border inspection is protection of US industry (making sure that insects are not given a free ride where they would infect US crops), and compliance with US regulations (making sure that the items in the truck are allowed into the US). The inspectors take a small sample of the good and test it according to regulations. In the case of vegetables, it is usually a visual inspection for pests and general condition. There is no routine test for contamination.

The consequence of this is that the process of tracing back to the source is identical whether the farm is in the US or in Mexico.

(end of part 1)

Comments
Post a Comment
by lonewolf07, Aug 14, 2008 02:05AM
Are GMO's labelled in the USA - they aren't in Canada.  Have they ever been part of an outbreak - salmonella or non-salmonella?




by swampcritter, Aug 14, 2008 03:56AM
GM crops are not labelled in the US.

As to whether or not a GM crop has been implicated in an outbreak, there can only be speculation.

The most common GM crops are grains that are grown in large farm settings, and they typically undergo a high amount of processing before they reach the consumer. That processing would destroy any normal pathogens.

A few years ago, GM tomatoes were common. They were introduced in the early 1990s, and their use peaked in 1998. At this time they are no longer grown commercially. They just did not give the farmers enough benefit to offset the higher seed cost.

There have been experiments with other GM fruits and vegetables, but these do not occupy a large commercial niche.

For legal reasons (this is where we jump ahead to part 2 for a moment), the FDA will not identify a specific farm in a public release of their data. They will probably not identify the crop variety, either.

Post a Comment
Post